Yesterday, I had the distinct pleasure and honor (to use a phrase usually accompanying a speech introduction, but certainly appropriate here) of attending The Joyful Jewel's second annual Vision and Voice: The Marriage of Pen and Palette. Marrianna is one of approximately 90 artists that display in the gallery. Some of her work is shown on the gallery's site.
As the introductory blurb on the gallery's web site says, "The Joyful Jewel
invited writers of all ages and levels to come to the
gallery, pen in hand. They perused the gallery to see which piece of
art, jewelry, or craft would inspire them. Presentations will include
the Writer Artist, the Visual Artist, and the Art!" One writer chose a painting by Marrianna as her inspiration. Artists and writers presented their works, artists showing the painting that inspired the writer as the poem was read and speaking of what inspired them to paint that work.
Though a few had, most of the artists and writers had never met each other. I knew a few artists, but none of the writers. I was surprised how many of the artists, speaking after the reading of the poem their work inspired, said that the writer had exactly captured the meaning they intended, a couple saying that the poem "nailed" it. It's possible that they said that partially from politeness. Who knows, and it isn't important. There were some poems that I could not fathom how the writer's poem could possibly have come from that particular work. There were, however, a few poems that spoke exactly the same message I got from the art. What all that that says about me, the art, or the writer is irrelevant. Perhaps because of the tension between art and words it inspired, it was an interesting afternoon.
There was a lot of very nice art, and it makes me particularly proud that one source of inspiration came from Marrianna's work. Her style is unique, and her use of color a joy to behold. Though perhaps biased, I think she is among the top artists in the gallery. There are other very good artists, some of which I think are simply fantastic, Florence Johnson for example, but none use color better or are better artists.
Pittsboro is a small town about which is said, "You can't swing a cat without hitting an artist." I think in this instance artist is meant to include all forms of art and craft, including writing. Only one writer's poem impressed me enough to seek her out after the show. She's Michele Tracey Berger, and she writes a blog about creativity. Speaking solely from hearing her poem yesterday and a brief perusal of her blog, she is talented and certainly well qualified to write about creativity.
I enjoy days like that. I think it's stepping into a different frame of reference, a new perspective, that makes life interesting.
Monday, March 19, 2012
Monday, March 12, 2012
It Wont Let Me Go
I've been quilting most of the morning, and as usual my mind had been churning through thoughts completely unrelated to quilting. I've tried to press on but, as the title suggests, the thoughts wont let me go. As a result, here I am writing without having much idea about what to say.
The problem is with a novel I began reading last evening after 11:00 PM, a very late time for me. I was only able to complete two chapters before I gave up and went to bed. Even then though, the book wouldn't let me go. I know I was awake thinking about the second chapter for at least an hour. I should have got up and read until I finished it.
The book is "March", by Geraldine Brooks [2005, Penguin Books, New York, NY]. Usually I wouldn't write about anything after only two chapters, but this one grabbed me. It must have done the same for quite a few folk; it's a Pulitzer Prize winner. The premise, interesting in itself, is that the story is told by Mr. March, husband and father of the women in Louisa May Alcott's "Little Women." In that book, he is away during the Civil War, and this one tells us where and why.
I'll not try to retell the story. I've come upon it late and since it is a 2005 Pulitzer winner, I suppose many, if not most, have already read it for themselves. I want to tell of the sense of shock, merged with some shame, of the cruelty of the slave owner, Augustus Clement. I am born and, mostly, raised in the South, and as such am the recipient of many wheelbarrow loads of embellishments about slavery and how they were treated in those times. In the stories of my youth, slaves loved their masters, and masters cared for slaves' health and welfare. I've known that wasn't a complete story, but until recently did not try to inform myself of actual conditions. I credit Ta-Nehesi Coates blog on The Atlantic for beginning the process of informing me that all those rosy tales of the South were mostly BS. Ms Brooks is also teaching me in the early chapters of her novel.
In my last post, Quilting Thoughts, I wrote mush that seemed to be asking why folk in the 1600-1920 didn't rise up against the injustices of their time. In comments, published and private, Felix wisely reminded me that in many cases they had no choice. It's obvious that I am hopelessly ignorant of why people act as they do. It takes shock to show me how awry my conceptions are. I'm very grateful to Mr. Coates, Ms Brooks, and friends that have helped me to begin to see. I'm anxious to contrinue reading March and to learn more that Ms Brooks has to teach me.
The problem is with a novel I began reading last evening after 11:00 PM, a very late time for me. I was only able to complete two chapters before I gave up and went to bed. Even then though, the book wouldn't let me go. I know I was awake thinking about the second chapter for at least an hour. I should have got up and read until I finished it.
The book is "March", by Geraldine Brooks [2005, Penguin Books, New York, NY]. Usually I wouldn't write about anything after only two chapters, but this one grabbed me. It must have done the same for quite a few folk; it's a Pulitzer Prize winner. The premise, interesting in itself, is that the story is told by Mr. March, husband and father of the women in Louisa May Alcott's "Little Women." In that book, he is away during the Civil War, and this one tells us where and why.
I'll not try to retell the story. I've come upon it late and since it is a 2005 Pulitzer winner, I suppose many, if not most, have already read it for themselves. I want to tell of the sense of shock, merged with some shame, of the cruelty of the slave owner, Augustus Clement. I am born and, mostly, raised in the South, and as such am the recipient of many wheelbarrow loads of embellishments about slavery and how they were treated in those times. In the stories of my youth, slaves loved their masters, and masters cared for slaves' health and welfare. I've known that wasn't a complete story, but until recently did not try to inform myself of actual conditions. I credit Ta-Nehesi Coates blog on The Atlantic for beginning the process of informing me that all those rosy tales of the South were mostly BS. Ms Brooks is also teaching me in the early chapters of her novel.
In my last post, Quilting Thoughts, I wrote mush that seemed to be asking why folk in the 1600-1920 didn't rise up against the injustices of their time. In comments, published and private, Felix wisely reminded me that in many cases they had no choice. It's obvious that I am hopelessly ignorant of why people act as they do. It takes shock to show me how awry my conceptions are. I'm very grateful to Mr. Coates, Ms Brooks, and friends that have helped me to begin to see. I'm anxious to contrinue reading March and to learn more that Ms Brooks has to teach me.
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Quilting Thoughts
Obviously, regular posting has not been a priority recently. On the other hand, I have been quilting almost daily. I'd like to post here equally as regularly. I meant to, but haven't done the work that is required to make it happen. I like quilting, and find my mind cruising through many subjects as I quilt, and if I wrote something each day that I think about, I would be here much more often. What I need to do is to somehow note whatever I'm thinking about at the quilting table, and when I move to the computer desk I'd have an idea formed for a subject. A small jog note would do, but as I quilt I haven't taken the time to make that note.
This morning as I worked at the quilting table, a TV program that my wife and I watched seemed to be the topic of the morning. The program is Downton Abbey. We enjoyed it together, though Marrianna probably more so than I, and that difference is subject for this post. What makes me uncomfortable watching programs showing wide differences of class and fortune? I think Season One was better then Two. Two became more of a soap opera that should be on afternoon TV, and I think when the Season Three arrives that will be even more accurate. But that's not my subject.
In programs such as this, I usually identify with the servants much more than the "upper class." I never watched Upstairs/Downstairs because I knew that about myself. Also, I've not seen the current Movie "The Help" for similar reasons. I just think the "help" was being taken advantage of in the entire book/movie.
I watched "Who Do You Think You Are?", another TV program ripped from British TV (wait for it - I'm going to link this somehow to the announced subject.). This program is largely an advertisement for Ancestry.com, but I've become interested in watching people explore their ancestors. This past week, the singer-actor Reba McEntyre searched through her mother's ancestors. Her sixth grandfather arrived in America at the age of nine in the late 1600's, an indentured servant. Over time he became a landowner, and the family prospered after that. Reba wondered how the child's father could have let his son leave at such a young age, so she went to Britain to get more information.
I don't recall the gentleman's name whom she met, but he gently explained to her the facts of life in Britain in the late 1600's. The boy was almost certainly better off as an indentured servant than he would have been in Britain at the time. And here's where we get back to the subject.
I've often wondered why there weren't more insurrections. Servants and feudal folk seemed to accept their life much more than I would have thought they might. When the only solution is to essentially sell your nine year old son into what is essentially slavery, with a possible out when, and if, he reaches 21, seems to be a terrible, unbearable system. Watching Downton Abbey's servants seem to accept their status as late as 1920 seems strange to me.
But how am I different? I spent almost 21 years enlisted in the Air Force. The officer-enlisted class system is equally as divided. I accepted the differences then, and I'm sure there are almost the same now. I never felt the impulse to complain, though there were times that I absolutely knew that I was being discriminated against because I was enlisted. Back then, I couldn't even buy life or automobile insurance from USAA because they didn't sell to enlisted folk. They do now, but in the 60's when I needed it, no.
I suppose I realize that there are always going to be some levels of class differences. It isn't pretty, but it certainly exists. I've not often pushed against the barriers, and I suppose it seems strange to be wondering why they exist now. Maybe I should just stick to my quilting and let others change the way we all interact with one another.
This morning as I worked at the quilting table, a TV program that my wife and I watched seemed to be the topic of the morning. The program is Downton Abbey. We enjoyed it together, though Marrianna probably more so than I, and that difference is subject for this post. What makes me uncomfortable watching programs showing wide differences of class and fortune? I think Season One was better then Two. Two became more of a soap opera that should be on afternoon TV, and I think when the Season Three arrives that will be even more accurate. But that's not my subject.
In programs such as this, I usually identify with the servants much more than the "upper class." I never watched Upstairs/Downstairs because I knew that about myself. Also, I've not seen the current Movie "The Help" for similar reasons. I just think the "help" was being taken advantage of in the entire book/movie.
I watched "Who Do You Think You Are?", another TV program ripped from British TV (wait for it - I'm going to link this somehow to the announced subject.). This program is largely an advertisement for Ancestry.com, but I've become interested in watching people explore their ancestors. This past week, the singer-actor Reba McEntyre searched through her mother's ancestors. Her sixth grandfather arrived in America at the age of nine in the late 1600's, an indentured servant. Over time he became a landowner, and the family prospered after that. Reba wondered how the child's father could have let his son leave at such a young age, so she went to Britain to get more information.
I don't recall the gentleman's name whom she met, but he gently explained to her the facts of life in Britain in the late 1600's. The boy was almost certainly better off as an indentured servant than he would have been in Britain at the time. And here's where we get back to the subject.
I've often wondered why there weren't more insurrections. Servants and feudal folk seemed to accept their life much more than I would have thought they might. When the only solution is to essentially sell your nine year old son into what is essentially slavery, with a possible out when, and if, he reaches 21, seems to be a terrible, unbearable system. Watching Downton Abbey's servants seem to accept their status as late as 1920 seems strange to me.
But how am I different? I spent almost 21 years enlisted in the Air Force. The officer-enlisted class system is equally as divided. I accepted the differences then, and I'm sure there are almost the same now. I never felt the impulse to complain, though there were times that I absolutely knew that I was being discriminated against because I was enlisted. Back then, I couldn't even buy life or automobile insurance from USAA because they didn't sell to enlisted folk. They do now, but in the 60's when I needed it, no.
I suppose I realize that there are always going to be some levels of class differences. It isn't pretty, but it certainly exists. I've not often pushed against the barriers, and I suppose it seems strange to be wondering why they exist now. Maybe I should just stick to my quilting and let others change the way we all interact with one another.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Required Traits of Our President
I don't often think about what " We the people" require of those who we elect to be President. Earlier this week, though, I was reading Ta Nehesi Coates' blog, as I do almost every day, and he referenced an article by James Fallows in the March issue of The Atlantic, "Obama Explained." I read the entire article, printed it and re-read it. It's long, 22 printed pages, and very interesting. The entire article is well worth reading for its in-depth discussion of President Obama's first three years. I am still digesting that. For this post, however, I'm primarily interested in what we require of our president.
The traits Fallows lists that are required of a President were impressive.
That said, for me President Obama has more of the desired traits and qualifications than any President I can recall. I think probably in the modern days of the Presidency, Truman was as close as anyone to having all the traits, but then I was only six when he was thrust onto the Presidency.
Anyway, it is interesting to think of what we require of a president and then how quickly we lose faith and confidence when he doesn't exhibit every one of our requirements.
The traits Fallows lists that are required of a President were impressive.
Presidents fail because not to fail would require, in the age of modern communications and global responsibilities, a range of native talents and learned skills no real person has ever possessed. These include “smarts” in the normal sense—the analytical ability to cope with the stream of short- and long-term decisions that come at a president nonstop. (How serious is the latest provocation out of North Korea? What are the “out year” budget implications of a change in Medicaid repayment formulas?) A president needs rhetorical clarity and eloquence, so that he can explain to publics at home and around the world the intent behind his actions and—at least as important—so that everyone inside the administration understands his priorities clearly enough that he does not have to wade into every little policy fight to enforce his preferences.
A president needs empathy and emotional intelligence, so that he can prevail in political dealings with his own party and the opposition in Washington, and in face-to-face negotiations with foreign leaders, who otherwise will go away saying that this president is “weak” and that the country’s leadership role is suspect. He needs to be confident but not arrogant; open-minded but not a weather vane; resolute but still adaptable; historically minded but highly alert to the present; visionary but practical; personally disciplined but not a prig or martinet. He should be physically fit, disease-resistant, and capable of being fully alert at a moment’s notice when the phone rings at 3 a.m.—yet also able to sleep each night, despite unremitting tension and without chemical aids.That is an impressive list and one Fallows says no real person has ever possessed. I think he has a good description, but I'm not sure it's one no real person has ever possessed. In fact, it is likely that the person who would desire to be President pretty much automatically disqualifies him (or her), especially "his own defects and try to offset them." That last phrase would probably trip every one of them. There are, I believe, people who have every one of these traits, and also have the wisdom and self knowledge to know that the job of President is not a place for them. In other words, the desire to be President, in and of itself shows that the person is too ego-centric to fulfill that last qualification.
Ideally he would be self-aware enough that, in the center of a system that treats him as emperor-god, he could still recognize his own defects and try to offset them.
That said, for me President Obama has more of the desired traits and qualifications than any President I can recall. I think probably in the modern days of the Presidency, Truman was as close as anyone to having all the traits, but then I was only six when he was thrust onto the Presidency.
Anyway, it is interesting to think of what we require of a president and then how quickly we lose faith and confidence when he doesn't exhibit every one of our requirements.
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Sunday Morning Thoughts
Many, many years ago there was a comic strip set in a small western town somewhere around the turn of the century. I can't remember the strip's title or the character's names. I do remember there was one character who was sort of different. He wore a side gun when almost no one else in the strip did. I suppose he was sort of the gunman, the slightly disreputable guy in a relatively peaceful town. I remember one Sunday's strip particularly.
Added: It's wonderful what is available through Google. The strip's name was Rick O'Shay, and the gunman's name was Hipshot Percussion. I loved that comic strip, along with others that are no longer around. IMHO, today's strips aren't nearly as good as some of the old ones, either in their art or the story, with very few exceptions.
In this particular strip, Hipshot was on his horse riding in the hills above the town, the sky was a sunrise red, the mountains and hillsides were in glory, everyone else in in church in the valley below. He looked around at the vista and said that though he didn't go to church, this was as close to being religious as he could get, appreciating the beauty all around him.
In the very first sentence of this, new blog I said that "Even if I were not a true believer, and I'm pretty sure that I am not in many ways ...". Today, I'm sitting at the keyboard rather than a pew. I've read the paper, including the comics which don't seem to speak to me as often as in the past. I'd rather be sitting here thinking about what to write, what is a believer, politics, and the sun flooding the room through my skylight.
Let me change the subject, just slightly. Marrianna is on the phone downstairs with John, a very good friend. He called because he had some news that he just had to share. His daughter lives in northern California and is expecting his first grandchild in April. John and his current wife can't afford to go. This morning he received a phone call telling him that several friends of both he and his daughter had pooled their airline miles and got him and his wife tickets to come to California in April to be at the birth of their first grandchild. John was almost in tears.
I think that small anecdote of people's goodness and generosity blends nicely with where I hoped to go. John and I aren't believers in a god restricted by Christianity, Judaism, or other 'ism. I wouldn't even attempt to say what John believes, and I still struggle to say explicitly what I believe. It's always easier to say what I do not believe.
Today, however, I am not going to go either way, writing about what I do or do not believe. John's story is sufficient. People don't have to be religious to be inspiring. If I had been in a pew this morning, I'd have missed this "good news". Having John share it with us is as fine a gift as I can imagine.
Added: It's wonderful what is available through Google. The strip's name was Rick O'Shay, and the gunman's name was Hipshot Percussion. I loved that comic strip, along with others that are no longer around. IMHO, today's strips aren't nearly as good as some of the old ones, either in their art or the story, with very few exceptions.
In this particular strip, Hipshot was on his horse riding in the hills above the town, the sky was a sunrise red, the mountains and hillsides were in glory, everyone else in in church in the valley below. He looked around at the vista and said that though he didn't go to church, this was as close to being religious as he could get, appreciating the beauty all around him.
In the very first sentence of this, new blog I said that "Even if I were not a true believer, and I'm pretty sure that I am not in many ways ...". Today, I'm sitting at the keyboard rather than a pew. I've read the paper, including the comics which don't seem to speak to me as often as in the past. I'd rather be sitting here thinking about what to write, what is a believer, politics, and the sun flooding the room through my skylight.
Let me change the subject, just slightly. Marrianna is on the phone downstairs with John, a very good friend. He called because he had some news that he just had to share. His daughter lives in northern California and is expecting his first grandchild in April. John and his current wife can't afford to go. This morning he received a phone call telling him that several friends of both he and his daughter had pooled their airline miles and got him and his wife tickets to come to California in April to be at the birth of their first grandchild. John was almost in tears.
I think that small anecdote of people's goodness and generosity blends nicely with where I hoped to go. John and I aren't believers in a god restricted by Christianity, Judaism, or other 'ism. I wouldn't even attempt to say what John believes, and I still struggle to say explicitly what I believe. It's always easier to say what I do not believe.
Today, however, I am not going to go either way, writing about what I do or do not believe. John's story is sufficient. People don't have to be religious to be inspiring. If I had been in a pew this morning, I'd have missed this "good news". Having John share it with us is as fine a gift as I can imagine.
Friday, February 10, 2012
Beginning Blogging, Again
Even if I were not a true believer, and I'm pretty sure that I am not in many ways, when a sermon stirs the desire to begin blogging again, I think it's a pretty good idea to at least listen to that urge. For several years, I blogged at "Thinking Through My Fingers" and enjoyed it. When I stopped, I felt that I'd said all that I had to say, and that if I didn't have anything new, it was time to stop.
The sermon was given on Sunday, January 29th at University Presbyterian Church, Chapel, Hill, NC. Full disclosure, Bob Dunham is my brother-in-law, or to be more technically correct, my wife's brother-in-law. He is married to her sister, is a wonderful preacher, excellent community leader, even better person, and I love, respect, and am proud to say that I know the guy. As I left the service that day, I told Bob that his sermon made it very difficult to just go home and vegetate on the couch. I knew that it was time to become more involved. I don't know how you can hear the poem he used, or listen to the last paragraph of the sermon without feeling the need to do something. I've decided that my most effective way to speak out is to begin blogging again, speaking in the declarative sentences he urged us to use.
At TTMF, I specifically did not want the blog to be a record of an inner angst and discussion of myself. I still do not want that, though in order to speak with the declarative voice there are, I suspect, going to be times that it will be necessary for me to examine why and what I believe, about any subject. I hope that I will be able to speak clearly, concisely, and compassionately without ever closing off any other beliefs or thoughts.
I do not claim to have any personal knowledge or experience that inform what I will be writing. I am 72 years old, have had a very varied life background that I suspect will become more evident over time. Some of it is available at TTMF. Who I have been will certainly provide a platform as I approach and write about the times in which we live. I am liberal politically, but believe that I have enough sense to know that there are multiple perspectives to almost everything. I hope that my age hasn't hardened my ideas that they cannot be challenged or changed.
I expect that as we proceed thought this, I will be writing about ideas gleaned from a variety of other blogs and from the news of the day. I will always provide a link. I am in the process of building this blog, and a list of some of the blogs and news reports I read regularly will be published at the side. The design is not yet fully formed, but I think it's necessary to begin publishing now.
The sermon was given on Sunday, January 29th at University Presbyterian Church, Chapel, Hill, NC. Full disclosure, Bob Dunham is my brother-in-law, or to be more technically correct, my wife's brother-in-law. He is married to her sister, is a wonderful preacher, excellent community leader, even better person, and I love, respect, and am proud to say that I know the guy. As I left the service that day, I told Bob that his sermon made it very difficult to just go home and vegetate on the couch. I knew that it was time to become more involved. I don't know how you can hear the poem he used, or listen to the last paragraph of the sermon without feeling the need to do something. I've decided that my most effective way to speak out is to begin blogging again, speaking in the declarative sentences he urged us to use.
At TTMF, I specifically did not want the blog to be a record of an inner angst and discussion of myself. I still do not want that, though in order to speak with the declarative voice there are, I suspect, going to be times that it will be necessary for me to examine why and what I believe, about any subject. I hope that I will be able to speak clearly, concisely, and compassionately without ever closing off any other beliefs or thoughts.
I do not claim to have any personal knowledge or experience that inform what I will be writing. I am 72 years old, have had a very varied life background that I suspect will become more evident over time. Some of it is available at TTMF. Who I have been will certainly provide a platform as I approach and write about the times in which we live. I am liberal politically, but believe that I have enough sense to know that there are multiple perspectives to almost everything. I hope that my age hasn't hardened my ideas that they cannot be challenged or changed.
I expect that as we proceed thought this, I will be writing about ideas gleaned from a variety of other blogs and from the news of the day. I will always provide a link. I am in the process of building this blog, and a list of some of the blogs and news reports I read regularly will be published at the side. The design is not yet fully formed, but I think it's necessary to begin publishing now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)